Need to have the availability to overlap availability. Specifically, if we use the blockout function for setting availability, need to be able to add another availability that extends/overlaps it.
Why should we implement this
It is very frustrating if we have a set availability (specifically by using the blockout function), that if we have another availability issue, we have to carefully construct the new availability around the old one, or eliminate the blockout availability in order to set the new availability. We have several situations in which this is an issue - my current one is in setting a standard availability to cover child labor laws.
The current availability request function is very clunky, and not user friendly for repeating conflicts. |